↓ Skip to main content

The Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network: Early experience and lessons learned

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network: Early experience and lessons learned
Published in
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.06.099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica G.Y. Luc, Maral Ouzounian, Edward M. Bender, Arie Blitz, Nikki L. Stamp, Thomas K. Varghese, David T. Cooke, Mara B. Antonoff

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,495,805
of 13,441,497 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#220
of 3,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,298
of 131,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#2
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,441,497 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,589 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.