↓ Skip to main content

Genetic components of human pain sensitivity: a protocol for a genome-wide association study of experimental pain in healthy volunteers

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic components of human pain sensitivity: a protocol for a genome-wide association study of experimental pain in healthy volunteers
Published in
BMJ Open, April 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025530
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annina B Schmid, Kaustubh Adhikari, Luis Miguel Ramirez-Aristeguieta, Juan-Camilo Chacón-Duque, Giovanni Poletti, Carla Gallo, Francisco Rothhammer, Gabriel Bedoya, Andres Ruiz-Linares, David L Bennett

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#9,990,644
of 15,685,637 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#10,771
of 14,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,223
of 262,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#589
of 876 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,685,637 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 876 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.