You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Morphological differences between coastal bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops aduncus) populations identified using non-invasive stereo-laser photogrammetry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-48419-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin van Aswegen, Fredrik Christiansen, John Symons, Janet Mann, Krista Nicholson, Kate Sprogis, Lars Bejder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 23% |
| Australia | 6 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 48% |
| Scientists | 14 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,739,046
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#16,296
of 141,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,587
of 352,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#428
of 3,451 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,451 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.