↓ Skip to main content

A longitudinal study of the effects of internet use on subjective well-being

Overview of attention for article published in Media Psychology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 281)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
44 tweeters
Title
A longitudinal study of the effects of internet use on subjective well-being
Published in
Media Psychology, August 2019
DOI 10.1080/15213269.2019.1624177
Authors

Dario Paez, Gisela Delfino, Salvador Vargas-Salfate, James H. Liu, Homero Gil De Zúñiga, Sammyh Khan, Maite Garaigordobil

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2019.
All research outputs
#460,971
of 13,606,487 outputs
Outputs from Media Psychology
#23
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,499
of 220,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Media Psychology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,606,487 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them