You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing physicians’ and patients’ reporting on adverse reactions in randomized trials on acupuncture—a secondary data analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12906-019-2638-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thea Schwaneberg, Claudia M. Witt, Stephanie Roll, Daniel Pach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 75% |
| Brazil | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,163,549
of 24,137,933 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#994
of 3,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,869
of 345,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#27
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.