↓ Skip to main content

Oxygen therapy for pneumonia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oxygen therapy for pneumonia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006607.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanling Zhang, Chenli Fang, Bi Rong Dong, Taixiang Wu, Jue Lin Deng

Abstract

Oxygen therapy is widely used in the treatment of lung diseases. However, the effectiveness of oxygen therapy as a treatment for pneumonia is not well known.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 151 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 20%
Student > Master 31 20%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 39 25%
Unknown 19 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 21 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,125,645
of 15,072,583 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,187
of 11,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,629
of 125,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,072,583 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.