↓ Skip to main content

A mixed-methods study of challenges experienced by clinical teams in measuring improvement

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
104 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A mixed-methods study of challenges experienced by clinical teams in measuring improvement
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, August 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Woodcock, Elisa G Liberati, Mary Dixon-Woods

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 36%
Researcher 4 29%
Unspecified 2 14%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 14%
Unspecified 2 14%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Other 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2019.
All research outputs
#239,049
of 13,703,578 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#152
of 1,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,976
of 243,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,703,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.