You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transplantation of high-risk donor livers after resuscitation and viability assessment using a combined protocol of oxygenated hypothermic, rewarming and normothermic machine perfusion: study protocol for a prospective, single-arm study (DHOPE-COR-NMP trial)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028596 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yvonne de Vries, Tim A Berendsen, Masato Fujiyoshi, Aad P van den Berg, Hans Blokzijl, Marieke T de Boer, Frans van der Heide, Ruben H J de Kleine, Otto B van Leeuwen, Alix P M Matton, Maureen J M Werner, Ton Lisman, Vincent E de Meijer, Robert Porte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 29% |
| Finland | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 23% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 47% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,649,891
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#8,327
of 25,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,615
of 353,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#324
of 893 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 893 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.