↓ Skip to main content

Twitter at the 2014 and 2015 Annual Meetings of the American Academy of Ophthalmology

Overview of attention for article published in Ophthalmology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Twitter at the 2014 and 2015 Annual Meetings of the American Academy of Ophthalmology
Published in
Ophthalmology, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.03.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven M. Christiansen, Thomas A. Oetting, Natasha L. Herz, Janice C. Law, Christopher P. O'Brien, Purnima S. Patel, Roma Patel, Jeff H. Pettey, Diana R. Shiba, Grace Sun, Tamara Fountain

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 15%
Australia 1 8%
Unknown 10 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 62%
Unspecified 2 15%
Social Sciences 2 15%
Decision Sciences 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,372,978
of 13,512,259 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmology
#365
of 4,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,978
of 262,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmology
#21
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,512,259 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.