You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Twitter at the 2014 and 2015 Annual Meetings of the American Academy of Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology, August 2016
Steven M. Christiansen, Thomas A. Oetting, Natasha L. Herz, Janice C. Law, Christopher P. O'Brien, Purnima S. Patel, Roma Patel, Jeff H. Pettey, Diana R. Shiba, Grace Sun, Tamara Fountain
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Bolivia, Plurinational State of||1||6%|
|Members of the public||10||59%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||4||24%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||6%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||17%|
|Student > Master||3||17%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||9||50%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2018.
All research outputs
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmology
of 6,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 366,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmology
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.