↓ Skip to main content

Rural-urban differences in hunting and birdwatching attitudes and participation intent

Overview of attention for article published in Human Dimensions of Wildlife, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rural-urban differences in hunting and birdwatching attitudes and participation intent
Published in
Human Dimensions of Wildlife, August 2019
DOI 10.1080/10871209.2019.1661046
Authors

Emily J. Wilkins, Nicholas W. Cole, Holly M. Miller, Rudy M. Schuster, Ashley A. Dayer, Jennifer N. Duberstein, David C. Fulton, Howard. W. Harshaw, Andrew H. Raedeke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 28%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Unspecified 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 31%
Social Sciences 6 15%
Environmental Science 5 13%
Unspecified 5 13%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,800,635
of 16,057,959 outputs
Outputs from Human Dimensions of Wildlife
#71
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,418
of 264,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Dimensions of Wildlife
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,057,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.