↓ Skip to main content

Unifying the detrimental and beneficial effects of social network site use on self-esteem: a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Media Psychology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 283)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters
Title
Unifying the detrimental and beneficial effects of social network site use on self-esteem: a systematic literature review
Published in
Media Psychology, August 2019
DOI 10.1080/15213269.2019.1656646
Authors

Hannes-Vincent Krause, Katharina Baum, Annika Baumann, Hanna Krasnova

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#794,927
of 13,640,858 outputs
Outputs from Media Psychology
#42
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,442
of 232,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Media Psychology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,640,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them