↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance enterography compared with ultrasonography in newly diagnosed and relapsing Crohn's disease patients: the METRIC diagnostic accuracy study

Overview of attention for article published in Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic resonance enterography compared with ultrasonography in newly diagnosed and relapsing Crohn's disease patients: the METRIC diagnostic accuracy study
Published in
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., August 2019
DOI 10.3310/hta23420
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart A Taylor, Sue Mallett, Gauraang Bhatnagar, Stephen Morris, Laura Quinn, Florian Tomini, Anne Miles, Rachel Baldwin-Cleland, Stuart Bloom, Arun Gupta, Peter John Hamlin, Ailsa L Hart, Antony Higginson, Ilan Jacobs, Sara McCartney, Charles D Murray, Andrew Ao Plumb, Richard C Pollok, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo, Zainib Shabir, Andrew Slater, Damian Tolan, Simon Travis, Alastair Windsor, Peter Wylie, Ian Zealley, Steve Halligan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Researcher 8 7%
Unspecified 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 48 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 24%
Unspecified 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 50 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,337,903
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#486
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,034
of 360,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.