↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance enterography compared with ultrasonography in newly diagnosed and relapsing Crohn’s disease patients: the METRIC diagnostic accuracy study

Overview of attention for article published in Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic resonance enterography compared with ultrasonography in newly diagnosed and relapsing Crohn’s disease patients: the METRIC diagnostic accuracy study
Published in
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., August 2019
DOI 10.3310/hta23420
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart A Taylor, Sue Mallett, Gauraang Bhatnagar, Stephen Morris, Laura Quinn, Florian Tomini, Anne Miles, Rachel Baldwin-Cleland, Stuart Bloom, Arun Gupta, Peter John Hamlin, Ailsa L Hart, Antony Higginson, Ilan Jacobs, Sara McCartney, Charles D Murray, Andrew AO Plumb, Richard C Pollok, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo, Zainib Shabir, Andrew Slater, Damian Tolan, Simon Travis, Alastair Windsor, Peter Wylie, Ian Zealley, Steve Halligan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 21%
Unspecified 2 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 8 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,449,416
of 15,729,358 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#308
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,321
of 263,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,729,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.