↓ Skip to main content

Formula versus maternal breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Formula versus maternal breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002972.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown, Verena Walsh, William McGuire

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 186 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 21%
Student > Bachelor 34 18%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 33 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,462,590
of 15,626,021 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,135
of 11,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,065
of 263,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,626,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.