↓ Skip to main content

Contact tracing strategies in household and congregate environments to identify cases of tuberculosis in low- and moderate-incidence populations

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contact tracing strategies in household and congregate environments to identify cases of tuberculosis in low- and moderate-incidence populations
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013077.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darryl Braganza Menezes, Bunota Menezes, Martin Dedicoat

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 21%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Other 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 10 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,965,203
of 15,766,388 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,672
of 11,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,856
of 264,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,766,388 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.