↓ Skip to main content

Tactical nuclear weapons, 2019

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
78 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
Title
Tactical nuclear weapons, 2019
Published in
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, August 2019
DOI 10.1080/00963402.2019.1654273
Authors

Hans M. Kristensen, Matt Korda

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2019.
All research outputs
#272,534
of 13,517,557 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#62
of 698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,711
of 163,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,517,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.