↓ Skip to main content

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000329.pub3
Authors

Rosalie J Fergusson, Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez, Anne Lethaby, Cindy Farquhar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,879,950
of 13,622,686 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,753
of 10,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,057
of 227,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,622,686 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.