↓ Skip to main content

Are combined bleaching techniques better than their sole application? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Oral Investigations, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are combined bleaching techniques better than their sole application? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00784-019-03042-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andres Felipe Millan Cardenas, Bianca Medeiros Maran, Lucila Cristina Rodrigues Araújo, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de Siqueira, Letícia Maíra Wambier, Carla Castiglia Gonzaga, Alessandro D. Loguercio, Alessandra Reis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 35 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Engineering 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 37 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2019.
All research outputs
#18,689,206
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#842
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,990
of 340,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#19
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.