↓ Skip to main content

Different Neoatherosclerosis Patterns in Drug-Eluting- and Bare-Metal Stent Restenosis ― Optical Coherence Tomography Study ―

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different Neoatherosclerosis Patterns in Drug-Eluting- and Bare-Metal Stent Restenosis ― Optical Coherence Tomography Study ―
Published in
Circulation Journal, January 2019
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-18-0701
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daisuke Nakamura, Keisuke Yasumura, Hitoshi Nakamura, Yutaka Matsuhiro, Koji Yasumoto, Akihiro Tanaka, Yasuharu Matsunaga-Lee, Masamichi Yano, Masaki Yamato, Yasuyuki Egami, Ryu Shutta, Yasushi Sakata, Jun Tanouchi, Masami Nishino

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#10,365,530
of 13,583,919 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#715
of 1,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,495
of 200,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,583,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.