You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of a combined strengthening, stretching and functional training program versus usual-care on gait biomechanics and foot function for diabetic neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-36 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Dallemole Sartor, Ricky Watari, Anice Campos Pássaro, Andreja Paley Picon, Renata Haydée Hasue, Isabel CN Sacco |
| Abstract |
Polyneuropathy is a complication of diabetes mellitus that has been very challenging for clinicians. It results in high public health costs and has a huge impact on patients' quality of life. Preventive interventions are still the most important approach to avoid plantar ulceration and amputation, which is the most devastating endpoint of the disease. Some therapeutic interventions improve gait quality, confidence, and quality of life; however, there is no evidence yet of an effective physical therapy treatment for recovering musculoskeletal function and foot rollover during gait that could potentially redistribute plantar pressure and reduce the risk of ulcer formation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 518 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 507 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 91 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 7% |
| Researcher | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 107 | 21% |
| Unknown | 138 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 116 | 22% |
| Sports and Recreations | 41 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 9% |
| Unknown | 162 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,470
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,109
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,343
of 159,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#34
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.