↓ Skip to main content

Late failure of posterior fixation without bone fusion for vertebral metastases

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Late failure of posterior fixation without bone fusion for vertebral metastases
Published in
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, December 2015
DOI 10.1590/1413-785220152306151402
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renato Tavares Bellato, William Gemio Jacobsen Teixeira, Alessandro Gonzalez Torelli, Alexandre Fogaça Cristante, Tarcísio Eloy Pessoa de Barros Filho, Olavo Pires de Camargo

Abstract

: To verify the frequency of late radiological com-plications in spinal fixation surgeries performed without fu-sion in oncological patients. : This is a retrospective analysis analysing failure in cases of non-fused vertebral fixation in an oncology reference hospital between 2009 and 2014. Failure was defined as implant loosening or bre-akage, as well as new angular or translation deformities. : One hundred and five cases were analyzed. The most common site of primary tumor was the breast and the most common place of metastasis was the thoracic spine. The average follow-up was 22.7 months. Nine cases (8%) of failure were reported, with an average time until failure of 9.5 months. The most common failure was implant loosening. No case required further surgery. : The occurrence of failure was not different than that reported for fused cases. The time interval until failure was higher than the median of survival of the majority (88%) of cases. Level of Evidence IV, Therapeutic Study.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Paraguay 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 42%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Neuroscience 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,450,346
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Acta Ortopédica Brasileira
#71
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,769
of 387,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Ortopédica Brasileira
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.