↓ Skip to main content

An incremental training method with automated, extendable maze for training spatial behavioral tasks in rodents

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An incremental training method with automated, extendable maze for training spatial behavioral tasks in rodents
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-48965-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther Holleman, Jan Mąka, Tim Schröder, Francesco Battaglia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Psychology 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,299,584
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#58,737
of 125,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,127
of 340,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,645
of 3,414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.