↓ Skip to main content

The China–Japan–Korea Trilateral Free Trade Agreement: Why Did Trade Negotiations Stall?

Overview of attention for article published in Pacific Focus, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The China–Japan–Korea Trilateral Free Trade Agreement: Why Did Trade Negotiations Stall?
Published in
Pacific Focus, August 2019
DOI 10.1111/pafo.12142
Authors

Muhui Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 43%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 43%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 29%
Energy 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#12,524,100
of 15,765,184 outputs
Outputs from Pacific Focus
#35
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,184
of 265,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pacific Focus
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,765,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them