↓ Skip to main content

Cohesive framework for modelling plant cover class data

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cohesive framework for modelling plant cover class data
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, August 2019
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.13262
Authors

Kathryn M. Irvine, Wilson J. Wright, Erin K. Shanahan, Thomas J. Rodhouse

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 40%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Lecturer 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 60%
Environmental Science 6 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,185,662
of 16,127,129 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#677
of 1,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,221
of 266,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#38
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,127,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.