↓ Skip to main content

PaCTS 1.0: A Crowdsourced Reporting Standard for Paleoclimate Data

Overview of attention for article published in Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 306)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
46 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PaCTS 1.0: A Crowdsourced Reporting Standard for Paleoclimate Data
Published in
Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology, October 2019
DOI 10.1029/2019pa003632
Authors

D. Khider, J. Emile‐Geay, N. P. McKay, Y. Gil, D. Garijo, V. Ratnakar, M. Alonso‐Garcia, S. Bertrand, O. Bothe, P. Brewer, A. Bunn, M. Chevalier, L. Comas‐Bru, A. Csank, E. Dassié, K. DeLong, T. Felis, P. Francus, A. Frappier, W. Gray, S. Goring, L. Jonkers, M. Kahle, D. Kaufman, N. M. Kehrwald, B. Martrat, H. McGregor, J. Richey, A. Schmittner, N. Scroxton, E. Sutherland, K. Thirumalai, K. Allen, F. Arnaud, Y. Axford, T. Barrows, L. Bazin, S. E. Pilaar Birch, E. Bradley, J. Bregy, E. Capron, O. Cartapanis, H.‐W. Chiang, K. M. Cobb, M. Debret, R. Dommain, J. Du, K. Dyez, S. Emerick, M. P. Erb, G. Falster, W. Finsinger, D. Fortier, Nicolas Gauthier, S. George, E. Grimm, J. Hertzberg, F. Hibbert, A. Hillman, W. Hobbs, M. Huber, A. L. C. Hughes, S. Jaccard, J. Ruan, M. Kienast, B. Konecky, G. Le Roux, V. Lyubchich, V. F. Novello, L. Olaka, J. W. Partin, C. Pearce, S. J. Phipps, C. Pignol, N. Piotrowska, M.‐S. Poli, A. Prokopenko, F. Schwanck, C. Stepanek, G. E. A. Swann, R. Telford, E. Thomas, Z. Thomas, S. Truebe, L. Gunten, A. Waite, N. Weitzel, B. Wilhelm, J. Williams, J. J. Williams, M. Winstrup, N. Zhao, Y. Zhou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 42%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#538,946
of 18,758,139 outputs
Outputs from Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
#16
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,436
of 274,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,758,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.