↓ Skip to main content

生鮮な人肉をヒメスナホリムシに与える―観音崎産等脚目・端脚目甲殻類4種の飼育事例―

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer (0008543X), August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 14,191)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3284 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
生鮮な人肉をヒメスナホリムシに与える―観音崎産等脚目・端脚目甲殻類4種の飼育事例―
Published in
Cancer (0008543X), August 2019
DOI 10.18988/cancer.28.0_e153
Authors

川﨑 祐介

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,284 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 625. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#36,347
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#28
of 14,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#684
of 360,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#2
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.