↓ Skip to main content

Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008896.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myat E Arrowsmith, Catherine RH Aicken, Sonia Saxena, Azeem Majeed

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are highly effective and are the most widely used reversible contraceptive method in the world. However, in developed countries IUDs are among the least common methods of contraception used. We evaluated the effect of interventions to increase uptake of the copper IUD, a long-acting, reversible contraceptive method.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 163 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 26 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Social Sciences 23 14%
Psychology 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 30 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,860,058
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,739
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,405
of 117,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.