↓ Skip to main content

パーキンソン病の歩行障害を定量的に評価する方法

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Therapy Japan, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 287)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
パーキンソン病の歩行障害を定量的に評価する方法
Published in
Physical Therapy Japan, June 2016
DOI 10.15063/rigaku.11047
Authors

奥埜 博之, 西島 勇, 塚本 哲朗, 河島 則天

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,357,358
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Physical Therapy Japan
#46
of 287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,616
of 353,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Therapy Japan
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them