↓ Skip to main content

Pattern and levels of spending allocated to HIV prevention programs in low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pattern and levels of spending allocated to HIV prevention programs in low- and middle-income countries
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-221
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Amico, Benjamin Gobet, Carlos Avila-Figueroa, Christian Aran, Paul De Lay

Abstract

AIDS continues to spread at an estimated 2.6 new million infections per year, making the prevention of HIV transmission a critical public health issue. The dramatic growth in global resources for AIDS has produced a steady scale-up in treatment and care that has not been equally matched by preventive services. This paper is a detailed analysis of how countries are choosing to spend these more limited prevention funds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 33%
Social Sciences 13 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 9 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2012.
All research outputs
#6,063,875
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,253
of 14,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,031
of 160,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#57
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.