↓ Skip to main content

Methylphenidate Exposure Induces Dopamine Neuron Loss and Activation of Microglia in the Basal Ganglia of Mice

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
70 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
7 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Methylphenidate Exposure Induces Dopamine Neuron Loss and Activation of Microglia in the Basal Ganglia of Mice
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033693
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shankar Sadasivan, Brooks B. Pond, Amar K. Pani, Chunxu Qu, Yun Jiao, Richard J. Smeyne

Abstract

Methylphenidate (MPH) is a psychostimulant that exerts its pharmacological effects via preferential blockade of the dopamine transporter (DAT) and the norepinephrine transporter (NET), resulting in increased monoamine levels in the synapse. Clinically, methylphenidate is prescribed for the symptomatic treatment of ADHD and narcolepsy; although lately, there has been an increased incidence of its use in individuals not meeting the criteria for these disorders. MPH has also been misused as a "cognitive enhancer" and as an alternative to other psychostimulants. Here, we investigate whether chronic or acute administration of MPH in mice at either 1 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg, affects cell number and gene expression in the basal ganglia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 24%
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 19%
Psychology 14 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Neuroscience 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 9 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#237,632
of 17,822,916 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,957
of 166,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,166
of 133,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#49
of 3,073 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,822,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,073 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.