↓ Skip to main content

Microdeletion del(22)(q12.2) encompassing the facial development-associated gene, MN1 (meningioma 1) in a child with Pierre-Robin sequence (including cleft palate) and neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2): a…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microdeletion del(22)(q12.2) encompassing the facial development-associated gene, MN1 (meningioma 1) in a child with Pierre-Robin sequence (including cleft palate) and neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2): a case report and review of the literature
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2350-13-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom B Davidson, Pedro A Sanchez-Lara, Linda M Randolph, Mark D Krieger, Shi-Qi Wu, Ashok Panigrahy, Hiroyuki Shimada, Anat Erdreich-Epstein

Abstract

Pierre-Robin sequence (PRS) is defined by micro- and/or retrognathia, glossoptosis and cleft soft palate, either caused by deformational defect or part of a malformation syndrome. Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is an autosomal dominant syndrome caused by mutations in the NF2 gene on chromosome 22q12.2. NF2 is characterized by bilateral vestibular schwannomas, spinal cord schwannomas, meningiomas and ependymomas, and juvenile cataracts. To date, NF2 and PRS have not been described together in the same patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Belarus 1 1%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2015.
All research outputs
#6,929,388
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#460
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,750
of 172,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.