You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: Enhancing drought resilience with conjunctive use and managed aquifer recharge in California and Arizona (2016 Environ. Res. Lett. 11 035013)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/049501 |
Authors |
Bridget R Scanlon, Robert C Reedy, Claudia C Faunt, Donald Pool, Kristine Uhlman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 26% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 20 | 29% |
Engineering | 12 | 17% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 14% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#3,914
of 6,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,860
of 315,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#81
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.