You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Forests, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3390/f7030062 |
| Authors |
Luke Wallace, Arko Lucieer, Zbyněk Malenovský, Darren Turner, Petr Vopěnka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Italy | 2 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 744 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 732 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 156 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 153 | 21% |
| Researcher | 109 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 3% |
| Other | 93 | 13% |
| Unknown | 145 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 196 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 115 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 106 | 14% |
| Engineering | 87 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 5% |
| Unknown | 181 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,160,781
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Forests
#302
of 4,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,254
of 317,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forests
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,662 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.