↓ Skip to main content

Conservation Value of Non‐Native Banteng in Northern Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservation Value of Non‐Native Banteng in Northern Australia
Published in
Conservation Biology, June 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00428.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

COREY J. A. BRADSHAW, YUJI ISAGI, SHINGO KANEKO, DAVID M. J. S. BOWMAN, BARRY W. BROOK

Abstract

The global species extinction crisis has provided the impetus for elaborate translocation, captive breeding, and cloning programs, but more extreme actions may be necessary. We used mitochondrial DNA, Y-chromosome, and nuclear lactoferrin-encoding gene sequencing to identify a wild population of a pure-strain endangered bovid (Bos javanicus) introduced into northern Australia over 150 years ago. This places the Australian population in a different conservation category relative to its domesticated conspecific in Indonesia (i.e., Bali cattle) that has varying degrees of introgression from other domesticated Bos spp. The success of this endangered non-native species demonstrates that although risky, the deliberate introduction of threatened exotic species into non-native habitat may provide, under some circumstances, a biologically feasible option for conserving large herbivores otherwise imperiled in their native range.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 22%
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Professor 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 53%
Environmental Science 19 20%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,526,454
of 25,307,660 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,620
of 4,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,155
of 79,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.