You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Laboratory assessment of alternative stream velocity measurement methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0222263 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen Hundt, Kyle Blasch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 5 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,288,635
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#106,202
of 197,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,986
of 340,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,323
of 2,549 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,549 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.