↓ Skip to main content

Laboratory assessment of alternative stream velocity measurement methods

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laboratory assessment of alternative stream velocity measurement methods
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0222263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Hundt, Kyle Blasch

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 33%
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,449,941
of 15,821,644 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#70,761
of 156,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,013
of 266,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#85
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,821,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.