↓ Skip to main content

Measuring and categorizing the water-related downstream risks associated with mineral extraction in Honduras: How severe, and how distributed?

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Geography, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring and categorizing the water-related downstream risks associated with mineral extraction in Honduras: How severe, and how distributed?
Published in
Applied Geography, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102070
Authors

Nicholas Cuba, Benjamin Fash, John Rogan, Anam Khan, José-Luis Palma Herrera, Rafael Enrique Corrales Andino, Claudia Nataly Mondragón Rivera, Sara Martinez, Scott Sellwood

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,786,368
of 13,617,861 outputs
Outputs from Applied Geography
#239
of 757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,165
of 218,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Geography
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,617,861 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.