You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Therapeutic hypothermia in adult patients receiving extracorporeal life support: early results of a randomized controlled study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13019-016-0437-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip Y.K. Pang, Gillian H.L. Wee, Anne E.E. Hoo, Ismail Mohamed Tahir Sheriff, See Lim Lim, Teing Ee Tan, Yee Jim Loh, Ka Lee Kerk, Yoong Kong Sin, Chong Hee Lim |
| Abstract |
Cardiac arrest with cerebral ischaemia frequently leads to severe neurological impairment. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has emerged as a valuable adjunct in resuscitation of cardiac arrest. Despite ECLS, the incidence of permanent neurological injury remains high. We hypothesize that patients receiving ECLS for cardiac arrest treated with therapeutic hypothermia at 34 °C have lower neurological complication rates compared to standard ECLS therapy at normothermia. Early results of this randomized study suggest that therapeutic hypothermia is safe in adult patients receiving ECLS, with similar complication rates as ECLS without hypothermia. Further studies are warranted to measure the efficacy of this therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,906,049
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#122
of 1,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,730
of 301,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.