You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Public Repository of Xenografts Enables Discovery and Randomized Phase II-like Trials in Mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Cell, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.03.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth C. Townsend, Mark A. Murakami, Alexandra Christodoulou, Amanda L. Christie, Johannes Köster, Tiffany A. DeSouza, Elizabeth A. Morgan, Scott P. Kallgren, Huiyun Liu, Shuo-Chieh Wu, Olivia Plana, Joan Montero, Kristen E. Stevenson, Prakash Rao, Raga Vadhi, Michael Andreeff, Philippe Armand, Karen K. Ballen, Patrizia Barzaghi-Rinaudo, Sarah Cahill, Rachael A. Clark, Vesselina G. Cooke, Matthew S. Davids, Daniel J. DeAngelo, David M. Dorfman, Hilary Eaton, Benjamin L. Ebert, Julia Etchin, Brant Firestone, David C. Fisher, Arnold S. Freedman, Ilene A. Galinsky, Hui Gao, Jacqueline S. Garcia, Francine Garnache-Ottou, Timothy A. Graubert, Alejandro Gutierrez, Ensar Halilovic, Marian H. Harris, Zachary T. Herbert, Steven M. Horwitz, Giorgio Inghirami, Andrew M. Intlekofer, Moriko Ito, Shai Izraeli, Eric D. Jacobsen, Caron A. Jacobson, Sébastien Jeay, Irmela Jeremias, Michelle A. Kelliher, Raphael Koch, Marina Konopleva, Nadja Kopp, Steven M. Kornblau, Andrew L. Kung, Thomas S. Kupper, Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Ann S. LaCasce, Emma Lees, Loretta S. Li, A. Thomas Look, Masato Murakami, Markus Muschen, Donna Neuberg, Samuel Y. Ng, Oreofe O. Odejide, Stuart H. Orkin, Rachel R. Paquette, Andrew E. Place, Justine E. Roderick, Jeremy A. Ryan, Stephen E. Sallan, Brent Shoji, Lewis B. Silverman, Robert J. Soiffer, David P. Steensma, Kimberly Stegmaier, Richard M. Stone, Jerome Tamburini, Aaron R. Thorner, Paul van Hummelen, Martha Wadleigh, Marion Wiesmann, Andrew P. Weng, Jens U. Wuerthner, David A. Williams, Bruce M. Wollison, Andrew A. Lane, Anthony Letai, Monica M. Bertagnolli, Jerome Ritz, Myles Brown, Henry Long, Jon C. Aster, Margaret A. Shipp, James D. Griffin, David M. Weinstock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 60% |
| Scientists | 15 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 62 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 15% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 66 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#600,858
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell
#443
of 3,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,773
of 315,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell
#10
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.