↓ Skip to main content

Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002200.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Jeffery, Brigid E Hickey, Phillip N Hider

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 196 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Other 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Student > Master 17 8%
Other 52 26%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 47 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,067,556
of 16,254,253 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,888
of 11,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,288
of 266,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,254,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.