You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Chinese Social Credit System: A Model for Other Countries?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Modern Law Review, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-2230.12462 |
| Authors |
Daithí Mac Síthigh, Mathias Siems |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 31% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 60 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 27 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 25 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 68 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,328,063
of 25,460,285 outputs
Outputs from Modern Law Review
#73
of 735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,145
of 350,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Modern Law Review
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.