You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Supervised clustering for single-cell analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Methods, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41592-019-0534-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jimmy Tsz Hang Lee, Martin Hemberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 20 | 38% |
United Kingdom | 11 | 21% |
Canada | 4 | 8% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
Norway | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Czechia | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 31 | 58% |
Members of the public | 21 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 27% |
Researcher | 21 | 20% |
Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 18% |
Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 8% |
Computer Science | 8 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,199,214
of 24,823,556 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,523
of 5,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,529
of 346,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#62
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,823,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.