↓ Skip to main content

What are the important morbidities associated with paediatric cardiac surgery? A mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What are the important morbidities associated with paediatric cardiac surgery? A mixed methods study
Published in
BMJ Open, September 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028533
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine L Brown, Christina Pagel, Deborah Ridout, Jo Wray, David Anderson, David J Barron, Jane Cassidy, Peter Davis, Emma Hudson, Alison Jones, Andrew Mclean, Stephen Morris, Warren Rodrigues, Karen Sheehan, Serban Stoica, Shane M Tibby, Thomas Witter, Victor T Tsang, Martin Utley, Sheryl Snowball, Luke Maidment, Sarah Bohannon, Liz Smith, Kate Penny-Thomas, Joanne Webb, Sinead Cummins, John Stickley, Natasha Khan, Teresa Dickson, Ray Samson, Isobel Mcleod, Paul Wellman, Rhian Lakhani, Kathleen Selway, Carrie Cherrington, Andrew Parry, Rob Tulloh, Bill Gaynor, Rodney Franklin, Lisa Allera, Kate Bull, Trevor Ritchens, Branko Mimic, Jon Smith, Lyvonne Tume, Vibeke Hjortdal, Michael Vath, Tom Treasure, Anne Keatley Clarke, Bea Tuten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 27 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,245,315
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#10,098
of 25,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,917
of 351,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#370
of 817 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 817 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.