↓ Skip to main content

Modeling spatially and temporally complex range dynamics when detection is imperfect

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Modeling spatially and temporally complex range dynamics when detection is imperfect
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-48851-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clark S. Rushing, J. Andrew Royle, David J. Ziolkowski, Keith L. Pardieck

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 50%
Environmental Science 7 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,176,403
of 13,889,959 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#10,435
of 69,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,253
of 253,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,889,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.