You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patterns of drinking in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as self-reported on the Grog Survey App: a stratified sample
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0879-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
KS Kylie Lee, James H. Conigrave, Scott Wilson, Jimmy Perry, Noel Hayman, Catherine Zheng, Mustafa Al Ansari, Michael Doyle, Robin Room, Sarah Callinan, Tanya Chikritzhs, Tim Slade, Katherine M. Conigrave |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 8 | 62% |
Curaçao | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 20 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 4 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,276,008
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#265
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,531
of 343,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.