You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can integration reduce inequity in healthcare utilization? Evidence and hurdles in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-019-4480-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miaomiao Zhao, Baohua Liu, Linghan Shan, Cui Li, Qunhong Wu, Yanhua Hao, Zhuo Chen, Lan Lan, Zheng Kang, Libo Liang, Ning Ning, Mingli Jiao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,966,454
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,904
of 7,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,740
of 340,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#92
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.