↓ Skip to main content

Metagenomic analysis using next-generation sequencing of pathogens in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from pediatric patients with respiratory failure

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Metagenomic analysis using next-generation sequencing of pathogens in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from pediatric patients with respiratory failure
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-49372-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suguru Takeuchi, Jun-ichi Kawada, Kazuhiro Horiba, Yusuke Okuno, Toshihiko Okumura, Takako Suzuki, Yuka Torii, Shinji Kawabe, Sho Wada, Takanari Ikeyama, Yoshinori Ito

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,328,371
of 13,845,249 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#37,361
of 69,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,482
of 252,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,845,249 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.