You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Public health deworming programmes for soil‐transmitted helminths in children living in endemic areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000371.pub7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David C Taylor‐Robinson, Nicola Maayan, Sarah Donegan, Marty Chaplin, Paul Garner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Colombia | 2 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Nepal | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 406 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 66 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 15% |
| Unknown | 150 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 75 | 18% |
| Unknown | 167 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#648,690
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,186
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,568
of 354,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.