| Title |
A North American Hourly Assimilation and Model Forecast Cycle: The Rapid Refresh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Monthly Weather Review, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1175/mwr-d-15-0242.1 |
| Authors |
Stanley G. Benjamin, Stephen S. Weygandt, John M. Brown, Ming Hu, Curtis R. Alexander, Tatiana G. Smirnova, Joseph B. Olson, Eric P. James, David C. Dowell, Georg A. Grell, Haidao Lin, Steven E. Peckham, Tracy Lorraine Smith, William R. Moninger, Jaymes S. Kenyon, Geoffrey S. Manikin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 301 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 25% |
| Researcher | 49 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
| Professor | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 51 | 17% |
| Unknown | 59 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 122 | 40% |
| Engineering | 43 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 36 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 76 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Monthly Weather Review
#3,852
of 4,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,756
of 318,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monthly Weather Review
#27
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.