You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of intensive care unit supportive care on the physiology of Ebola virus disease in a universally lethal non-human primate model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-019-0268-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Poliquin, Duane Funk, Shane Jones, Kaylie Tran, Charlene Ranadheera, Mable Hagan, Kevin Tierney, Allen Grolla, Amrinder Dhaliwal, Alexander Bello, Anders Leung, Cory Nakamura, Darwyn Kobasa, Darryl Falzarano, Lauren Garnett, Hugues Fausther Bovendo, Heinz Feldmann, Murray Kesselman, Gregory Hansen, Jason Gren, George Risi, Mia Biondi, Todd Mortimer, Trina Racine, Yvon Deschambault, Sam Aminian, Jocelyn Edmonds, Ray Sourette, Mark Allan, Lauren Rondeau, Sharron Hadder, Christy Press, Christine DeGraff, Stephanie Kucas, Bradley W. M. Cook, B. J. Hancock, Anand Kumar, Reeni Soni, Darryl Schantz, Jarrid McKitrick, Bryce Warner, Bryan D. Griffin, Xiangguo Qiu, Gary P. Kobinger, Dave Safronetz, Derek Stein, Todd Cutts, James Kenny, Geoff Soule, Robert Kozak, Steven Theriault, Liam Menec, Robert Vendramelli, Sean Higgins, Guodong Liu, Niaz Md Rahim, Samantha Kasloff, Angela Sloan, Shihua He, Nikesh Tailor, Michael Gray, James E. Strong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,053,192
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#258
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,486
of 340,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.