You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence‐Based Invasive Predator Management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12251 |
| Authors |
Tim S. Doherty, Euan G. Ritchie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 30 | 28% |
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Christmas Island | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 56 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 71% |
| Scientists | 29 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 267 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 21% |
| Researcher | 47 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 12% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 98 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 69 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 79 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 141. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2023.
All research outputs
#295,177
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#93
of 1,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,640
of 339,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.