↓ Skip to main content

Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence-Based Invasive Predator Management

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 716)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
124 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence-Based Invasive Predator Management
Published in
Conservation Letters, May 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12251
Authors

Tim S. Doherty, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 123 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 26%
Researcher 28 22%
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Unspecified 12 9%
Other 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 46%
Environmental Science 38 29%
Unspecified 22 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 5 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#103,269
of 12,695,844 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#39
of 716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,388
of 263,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,695,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.