↓ Skip to main content

Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence-Based Invasive Predator Management

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 803)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
141 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence-Based Invasive Predator Management
Published in
Conservation Letters, May 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12251
Authors

Tim S. Doherty, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 185 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 21%
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Other 9 5%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 41%
Environmental Science 50 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 45 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#129,111
of 15,180,275 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#46
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,191
of 265,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,180,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.