↓ Skip to main content

Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence-Based Invasive Predator Management

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
139 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence-Based Invasive Predator Management
Published in
Conservation Letters, May 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12251
Authors

Tim S. Doherty, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 202 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 24%
Researcher 43 21%
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Other 8 4%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 41%
Environmental Science 57 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 50 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2020.
All research outputs
#154,808
of 17,485,908 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#56
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,175
of 270,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,485,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.