↓ Skip to main content

Stop jumping the gun: A call for evidence‐based invasive predator management

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 694)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
126 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stop jumping the gun: A call for evidence‐based invasive predator management
Published in
Conservation Letters, May 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12251
Authors

Doherty, Tim S., Ritchie, Euan G., Tim S. Doherty, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 120 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 27%
Researcher 27 21%
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Unspecified 11 9%
Other 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 45%
Environmental Science 38 30%
Unspecified 21 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 5 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#102,694
of 12,343,588 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#36
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,703
of 277,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,343,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.