↓ Skip to main content

Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence-Based Invasive Predator Management

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 786)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
141 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence-Based Invasive Predator Management
Published in
Conservation Letters, May 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12251
Authors

Tim S. Doherty, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 168 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 21%
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Other 7 4%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 40%
Environmental Science 48 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 40 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#115,704
of 14,375,009 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#42
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,085
of 263,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,375,009 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.