↓ Skip to main content

Measurement of Muscle Mass and Sarcopenia Using Anthropometry, Bioelectrical Impedance, and Computed Tomography in Surgical Patients with Colorectal Malignancy: Comparison of Agreement Between Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition and Cancer, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measurement of Muscle Mass and Sarcopenia Using Anthropometry, Bioelectrical Impedance, and Computed Tomography in Surgical Patients with Colorectal Malignancy: Comparison of Agreement Between Methods
Published in
Nutrition and Cancer, September 2019
DOI 10.1080/01635581.2019.1659381
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debra J. Jones, Simon Lal, Boyd J. Strauss, Chris Todd, Mark Pilling, Sorrel T. Burden

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 21%
Student > Master 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 23 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 30 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,557,665
of 25,425,223 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition and Cancer
#756
of 2,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,212
of 350,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition and Cancer
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,425,223 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.